— Andreas Malmdirect action should be limited to disrupting practices that might result in, or imminently threaten to generate, serious and irreversible harm. The urgency of the situation might be sufficient to override a presumption in favour of lawful advocacy or civil disobedience, if too much damage would occur before the process of reflection and reconsideration triggered by the latter could run its course.
Replicated under Fair Use from How to Blow Up a Pipeline by Andreas Malm. (Pg. 105)