Resource

The case against the Supreme Court of the United States Highlight

posted on in: Quote and Liked.

Rosenberg’s most depressing conclusion is that, while liberal judges are severely constrained in their ability to effect progressive change, reactionary judges have tremendous ability to hold back such change. “Studies of the role of the courts in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,” Rosenberg writes, “ show that courts can effectively block significant social reform.”

— vox.com

Replicated under Fair Use from The case against the Supreme Court of the United States by vox.com.