🌱 Seedling noteworthy

AI isn't useless. But is it worth it?

posted on in: ai.
~136 words, about a 1 min read.

Series Listing (click to open)
  1. Generative AI is Bad For Us:
    1. AI isn't useless. But is it worth it?
      April 17, 2024
    2. Stop using generative AI as a search engine
      December 6, 2024
    3. Defining AI as a political project
      December 9, 2024
    4. The phony comforts of the AI industry's useful idiots
      December 9, 2024
    5. The questions to ask when considering if AI content scraping should qualify as fair use
      December 19, 2024

I think this is a great nuanced take. It acknowledges something I agree with, that there are uses for generative AI, but that they simply may not be worth their impact or be projects aiming at desirable outcomes.

While I think occasionally LLM systems like OpenAI give us useful outputs, I increasingly wonder if so much of the value people perceive from them is more a reflection of confidence that they feel in the technology over themselves, that allows them to become unblocked on things that they'd otherwise dither on.

they do a poor job of much of what people try to do with them, they can't do the things their creators claim they one day might, and many of the things they are well suited to do may not be altogether that beneficial.



— Via Molly White, “AI isn't useless. But is it worth it?”
Page History

This page was first added to the repository on April 17, 2024 in commit 873ed3e4 and has since been amended 3 times. View the source on GitHub.

  1. Adding noteworthy fix for ai article
  2. Adding an AI post to the group.
  3. bugfix: consistent naming for ai tag
  4. chore: adding new links